A clash list is not a coordination system
Many coordination meetings are driven by long exports of clashes. The problem is that a long list does not automatically show priority, discipline ownership, due date, constructability impact, or closure trend.
The workflow needs a management layer that helps the team decide what matters first.
What the dashboard should clarify
A coordination dashboard should help answer operational questions: which discipline owns the issue, which zone is most critical, which clashes are repeated, what is blocking closure, and how the trend is changing between meetings.
This is where Power BI-style reporting can support Navisworks coordination without replacing technical judgment.
- Issue count by discipline and zone
- Open, closed, and repeated issues
- Priority by constructability risk
- Responsible party and target date
- Meeting-to-meeting progress
Better meetings
When coordination data is structured, meetings can move away from reviewing every clash and toward resolving the highest-impact conflicts. That is where BIM coordination becomes a project-control function, not only a model review activity.